X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 67FEDD1E233; Wed, 12 May 2004 17:51:05 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 71544-05; Wed, 12 May 2004 17:50:47 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 91CB9D1B4E6; Wed, 12 May 2004 17:50:41 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i4CKohue028539;
	Wed, 12 May 2004 16:50:43 -0400 (EDT)
To: josh@agliodbs.com
Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>,
	Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>, elein <elein@varlena.com>,
	Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>,
	"pgsql-www@postgresql.org" <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL Users' Group sites 
In-reply-to: <200405121334.54328.josh@agliodbs.com> 
References: <200405120946.01804.josh@postgresql.org>
	<1084395267.62466.39.camel@jester>
	<20040512154735.A35531@ganymede.hub.org>
	<200405121334.54328.josh@agliodbs.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
	message dated "Wed, 12 May 2004 13:34:54 -0700"
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 16:50:43 -0400
Message-ID: <28538.1084395043@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests=
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200405/47
X-Sequence-Number: 4426

Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> I would *love* to have the problem of so many users' groups that they
> overlap.

I agree with Josh.  We can sort it out if and when there's actually a
conflict, but at the moment this argument seems pretty pointless.

			regards, tom lane