X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACB9D329CBC for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 03:20:38 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 48418-09 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 02:20:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AEE7329C7B for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 03:20:33 +0100 (BST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8E2KXHW028696; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 22:20:33 -0400 (EDT) To: Peter Eisentraut Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Devel docs build wedged? Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 22:20:32 -0400 Message-ID: <28695.1095128432@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200409/97 X-Sequence-Number: 5167 http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/buildlog.html claims that a docs rebuild was done starting at 23:29 UTC (two hours ago now) ... but AFAICS the updated docs haven't been installed. Is the batch job wedged, or is it just that svr1 is even more overloaded than usual? (It may or may not be relevant that the log page doesn't show any "build finished" time. It is saying "Build completed successfully" though ...) regards, tom lane