Received: from magus.postgresql.org (magus.postgresql.org [87.238.57.229]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13EDE92B8EB for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 18:41:44 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Smtnx-0003pp-Vj for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 21:41:43 +0000 Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q65LfScB029223; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 17:41:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Tom Lane To: Magnus Hagander cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: 9.2beta web issues In-reply-to: References: <28687.1341523141@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Magnus Hagander message dated "Thu, 05 Jul 2012 23:22:03 +0200" Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 17:41:28 -0400 Message-ID: <29222.1341524488@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Archive-Number: 201207/18 X-Sequence-Number: 20767 Magnus Hagander writes: > IIRC we don't normally add this, because we don't want to "assign > bugs" to things in beta. Also IIRC, didn't Berkus set up a whole > separate list that people are supposed to report beta bugs on? Geez, I sure hope not, because if there is one I am not subscribed to it (AFAIK), and I bet few other hackers are either. In any case, it's the height of folly to imagine that people won't try to use the bug report form for beta bugs. regards, tom lane