From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
cc: PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: sort order of messages
In-reply-to: 
 <CABUevEx_tG618NL+xDR0J=6yPfZZZ2DvHy8eW2daxPD2HWLbwg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAPpdapdU8QdUDM7WaMxe6ABRGiKJVYay0gBqnBTSGMvdYDokeA@mail.gmail.com>
	<25569.1358188871@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<CABUevEw=qFt6tyq5k2zOk3Bk0vDWSqFmrndUKv5Cg_FgGz=u_A@mail.gmail.com>
	<28934.1358194616@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<CABUevEx_tG618NL+xDR0J=6yPfZZZ2DvHy8eW2daxPD2HWLbwg@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
	message dated "Mon, 14 Jan 2013 21:18:56 +0100"
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 15:27:00 -0500
Message-ID: <29856.1358195220@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org

Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Well, First/Last would be nice, but if you just add them at the bottom
>> of the page they will not help all that much --- it's the scroll-down
>> requirement that I'm mainly whining about.  Could we have at least a
>> subset of these at the top of the page?

> Sure, that shouldn't be too hard. We could repeate the
> First|Prev|Next|last, or we could repeat the whole thing including the
> month links easy enough.

First|Prev|Next|last would be enough for me, though maybe others have
other opinions.

			regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www