X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67F54D9D25 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 17:03:02 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 88851-03 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 20:02:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tetra.ehpg.net (tetra2.ehpg.net [65.19.161.8]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C669D9D23 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 17:02:56 -0300 (ADT) Received: from dsl081-087-203.lax1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.87.203]) by tetra.ehpg.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.50) id 1EIAnw-00080k-Vr; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:02:57 -0700 In-Reply-To: <200509211952.j8LJqe3C059567@smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl> References: <200509211952.j8LJqe3C059567@smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v734) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <2C5C4B05-B6D8-4D55-9313-4EB39F2AE51B@ehpg.net> Cc: , , "'Magnus Hagander'" , "'Dave Page'" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Gavin M. Roy" Subject: Re: PGDN and CVS Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:02:54 -0700 To: "Gevik babakhani" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.734) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 required=5 tests=[none] X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200509/59 X-Sequence-Number: 8573 Yes, is my pet project. I'll send you some info on the framewerk list. Gavin On Sep 21, 2005, at 12:52 PM, Gevik babakhani wrote: > Is this Framewerk the same as www.Framewerk.org? > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-www- >> owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Josh Berkus >> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 9:15 PM >> To: Gevik babakhani >> Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org; 'Magnus Hagander'; 'Dave Page' >> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] PGDN and CVS >> >> Gevik, >> >> >>> I'm not discouraged in anyway... I have just been looking over >>> and over >>> for a CMS that we could use in our project. Time after time I end up >>> with commercial products. And even if they are opensource, they >>> need to >>> be so much customized that one has to put more time in >>> customizing the >>> CMS framework rather than building the actual requirement. >>> >> >> What is it you're trying to implement, exactly, that you don't find >> supported? Is it the tree structure? >> >> Even if existing CMSes require customization, I think it'd be >> better to >> work with that project and try to get them involved in the >> feature. As >> far as I know, the only CMS you've really tried is Drupal. >> >> Both Bricolage and Framewerk are intimate with the PostgreSQL >> community >> and >> could be counted on to work with you. I don't think you even >> looked at >> Bricolage after Marc set it up. >> >> I also don't think you've evaluated "more time to implement" using >> valid >> criteria. If you do a custom CMS, you're going to need to >> impement all of >> the common stuff yourself: >> Authentication >> User management (including "e-mail me my password, etc.") >> Approval/rights structures >> Versioning admin >> Editors (inc. wyswyg and/or bbcode edit) >> RSS >> etc. >> Did your really add up coding all of the above compared to >> customizing an >> existing system? >> >> Again, I'm not trying to discourage you, but from my perspective >> half a >> CMS >> is worse than none. >> >> --Josh >> >> -- >> --Josh >> >> Josh Berkus >> Aglio Database Solutions >> San Francisco >> >> ---------------------------(end of >> broadcast)--------------------------- >> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to >> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not >> match >> > > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend > Gavin M. Roy 800 Pound Gorilla gmr@ehpg.net