Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ev54q-0008KQ-2X for pgsql-www@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 11 Mar 2018 17:48:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ev54o-0005Xw-DZ for pgsql-www@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 11 Mar 2018 17:48:06 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ev54o-0005XA-58 for pgsql-www@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 11 Mar 2018 17:48:06 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ev54h-000442-El for pgsql-www@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 11 Mar 2018 17:48:01 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w2BHltXR030196; Sun, 11 Mar 2018 13:47:55 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Magnus Hagander cc: Peter Eisentraut , PostgreSQL WWW Subject: Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org In-reply-to: References: <30022.1520642188@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Magnus Hagander message dated "Sun, 11 Mar 2018 15:18:13 +0100" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <30194.1520790475.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 13:47:55 -0400 Message-ID: <30195.1520790475@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Magnus Hagander writes: > On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> On 3/9/18 19:36, Tom Lane wrote: >>> I happened to notice that if you look at >>> https://coverage.postgresql.org/src/backend/optimizer/util/predtest.c.= gcov.html >>> it claims that the two occurrences of >>> elog(ERROR, "predicate_classify returned a bogus value"); >>> at lines 492 and 803 are reached. >> I can't reproduce this locally, so yeah, maybe we should check whether >> the toolchain could be updated. Now that I look, I don't see this behavior on my local machine (RHEL6, gcc 4.4.7, lcov 1.10) either. > Is it specifically "lcov" we are considering here? If so, we are on vers= ion > 1.13, and there is no newer version packaged for debian or from what I c= an > tell even released? It could also be a compiler issue, I believe. regards, tom lane