X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E3F0329DD1; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:41:03 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 96923-10; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:40:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B4E4329DB0; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:40:52 +0100 (BST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i8TKegrI003105; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:40:42 -0400 (EDT) To: Bruce Momjian Cc: Devrim GUNDUZ , PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List , PostgreSQL advocacy Subject: Re: Server unreliability In-reply-to: <200409292018.i8TKILw17221@candle.pha.pa.us> References: <200409292018.i8TKILw17221@candle.pha.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian message dated "Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:18:21 -0400" Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:40:42 -0400 Message-ID: <3104.1096490442@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200409/221 X-Sequence-Number: 5291 Bruce Momjian writes: > Yes, but how far is it from the image I saw to the completed site? I > have no idea, and why has there been so little progress in the past few > years? Lack of people doing the work is why. Complaining that nothing is getting done is just sucking time away from more productive activities ... and I think that extends to all the points made in this thread. We all know perfectly well what the problems are --- it's a matter of finding time, and sometimes money, to solve them. We don't need "new ideas" unless the ideas are about how to produce those resources. regards, tom lane