Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([87.238.57.229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TGd34-0006Ud-U8 for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 21:52:10 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TGd31-0004MJ-Q4 for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 21:52:10 +0000 Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8PLq33m000330; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:52:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Tom Lane To: Dimitri Fontaine cc: Magnus Hagander , Bruce Momjian , Marti Raudsepp , PostgreSQL www Subject: Re: searching for git commit hash In-reply-to: References: <20120530003133.GB24440@momjian.us> <29205.1338386624@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20120902125407.GA24536@momjian.us> Comments: In-reply-to Dimitri Fontaine message dated "Tue, 25 Sep 2012 23:34:01 +0200" Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:52:03 -0400 Message-ID: <329.1348609923@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Archive-Number: 201209/46 X-Sequence-Number: 20981 Dimitri Fontaine writes: > What I would like to have is the result of whatever tool is used those > days to know which branches contain any given patch. I though that was > ./src/tools/git_changelog but I can't seem to have that work here. That's what I use. What about it doesn't work for you? regards, tom lane