X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EC643A3BF4 for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 15:30:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 75988-08 for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 15:30:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.240]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208B43A1D8A for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 15:30:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id w67so82760cwb for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 07:30:02 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=o2evJQU5/mp4qt6S6qA7tYIjQPH+d804TuVLv6bEIOfbsXex+6j1dTVS5qIBWW35XT032EWaYSPTKMR0B6FM1oWHoj2WntvJ4ANKbl5nTOnSrWbgVYAJnRwnf6W0UgVsqagTHJ53v8J9wwcws+9nO6AxMjSoAVWWFe/YWL20erE= Received: by 10.11.117.22 with SMTP id p22mr229760cwc; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 07:30:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.11.119.55 with HTTP; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 07:30:01 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <330532b60411210730781d08bd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 10:30:01 -0500 From: Mitch Pirtle Reply-To: Mitch Pirtle To: PostgreSQL www Subject: Re: "Stretchy" vs. Fixed-width In-Reply-To: <20041120225913.C18806@ganymede.hub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <200411181953.10646.josh@agliodbs.com> <200411191107.44086.josh@agliodbs.com> <1100901738.389.169.camel@camel> <200411201216.44490.josh@agliodbs.com> <20041120225913.C18806@ganymede.hub.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200411/293 X-Sequence-Number: 6024 I'm not a layout person, but I will wager that any professionally-trained designer will tell you that variable-width layouts are asking for trouble. I designed a few templates that looked great, untl someone with a 1600x1200 or whatever monster LCD maximized the window - then that carefully crafted layout was blown to bits... My $0.02. -- Mitch On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 23:02:05 -0400 (AST), Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Sat, 20 Nov 2004, Josh Berkus wrote: > > > So, do people have reasons why one is better than the other?