Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B9352E0056 for ; Wed, 7 May 2008 12:37:55 -0300 (ADT) Received: from developer.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32965-05 for ; Wed, 7 May 2008 12:37:45 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.185]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25C312E006B for ; Wed, 7 May 2008 12:37:44 -0300 (ADT) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id e30so531662fke.3 for ; Wed, 07 May 2008 08:37:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=nWjTjTv97mNC3dRBdCcycILc0Mq7nKTATk6ciM1IEtE=; b=UcsUaQ36W8+aeKYP4iBldgZihMPQPhEXykpn4jOL8L01cAwp1DggYKG1b2ClbtlUrdc7wiImYN9aoDWoEUfbCVpGf9+ypngUinHk1fgja/WjY5Ui9nHC4yOFt06ur3w5vvJuD+hWnroU+i/IcK/cuPFmw6mgPtPK8BubsjR7qDY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hBbGbk+4Du1rWYcQ6jb0SLZdUIM0PVpKEUZoIWm1w0fPRAUQx7+TVLsdoBDgsiQtO2QRpHr1Phq4nBieG+HkY0r7jNGZ5PILMmy8mOHKgruWFvmhBZaKqM7bDywLKiilYj1hjYF7p+tS4RBm7xQ47TJ0P6N2lfC+0ZIm+y1Cw7Q= Received: by 10.82.182.18 with SMTP id e18mr232952buf.50.1210174662889; Wed, 07 May 2008 08:37:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.177.10 with HTTP; Wed, 7 May 2008 08:37:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <34d269d40805070837q19f1144eu8c316fa1cf6d8780@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 09:37:42 -0600 From: "Alex Hunsaker" To: "Bruce Momjian" Subject: Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists Cc: "Brendan Jurd" , "Tom Lane" , PostgreSQL-development In-Reply-To: <200805071503.m47F3xi10638@momjian.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <34d269d40805070752g4d578a1fu6acb00fd8e5f774e@mail.gmail.com> <200805071503.m47F3xi10638@momjian.us> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200805/176 X-Sequence-Number: 118175 On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Alex Hunsaker wrote: > > Plus it seems awkward to move a discussion thats taking place on > > -hackers over to patches... Granted I could post to patches first, > > wait an hour then send an email to hackers/reviewer and say hey! > > updated patch here! But it hardly seems worth it to me... In fact I > > would argue -patches should go away so we dont have that split. > > The goal is for the patches list to just discuss patches, but often > there are user API issues that come up after the patch is submitted, and > people often want that discussion on hackers. The current email split > can certainly be awkward. > A big part of my problem with the split is if there is a discussion taking place on -hackers I want to be able to reply to the discussion and say "well, here is what I was thinking". Sending it to -patches first waiting for it to hit the archive so I can link to it in my reply on -hackers seems pointless and convoluted. But if thats what you want, thats what ill try to do from now on :) For instance the patch Tom reviewed of mine yesterday only -hackers was copied, so I maintained that but also added -patches because I was sending in a patch... I think It will be an ongoing problem though especially for new people as they probably wont understand the "logical" split...