Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rhCWC-00AA6E-95 for pgsql-www@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2024 17:54:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rhCWA-009pER-7J for pgsql-www@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2024 17:54:26 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rhCWA-009pEI-0b for pgsql-www@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2024 17:54:26 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rhCW7-002l3N-Q0 for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2024 17:54:25 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 424HsJSo3752307; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 12:54:19 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Marcos Pegoraro cc: Euler Taveira , Daniel Gustafsson , Alvaro Herrera , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Diff of this page with other version In-reply-to: References: <202403021444.yyabqn4eatpx@alvherre.pgsql> <3597695.1709565152@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Marcos Pegoraro message dated "Mon, 04 Mar 2024 14:46:08 -0300" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-ID: <3752305.1709574859.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2024 12:54:19 -0500 Message-ID: <3752306.1709574859@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Marcos Pegoraro writes: > Em seg., 4 de mar. de 2024 às 12:12, Tom Lane escreveu: >> Given that we've not offered something like this >> at all before, I think it's silly to put in a lot of up-front effort >> in advance of seeing what the demand really is. > Well, only saying that I brought to this discussion several committers > is proof of how beneficial this feature would be. Nonsense. The committers who have commented have all said that it'd be a totally unacceptable amount of work for dubious gain. regards, tom lane