X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [64.117.224.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74BEED1B503; Tue, 9 Sep 2003 03:14:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [64.117.224.130]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 98872-05; Tue, 9 Sep 2003 00:13:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr3.postgresql.org (gborg.postgresql.org [64.117.225.160]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DAB5D1B50E; Tue, 9 Sep 2003 00:13:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: from pow1.ims.telstra.com.au (pow1.ims.telstra.com.au [203.14.14.252]) by svr3.postgresql.org (8.12.9/8.12.6) with SMTP id h893DZSA081632; Mon, 8 Sep 2003 23:13:36 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from justin@postgresql.org) Received: from postgresql.org (h114-98.ims.telstra.com.au [203.18.114.98]) by pow1.ims.telstra.com.au (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h893EwKV014270; Tue, 9 Sep 2003 03:14:59 GMT Message-ID: <3F5D450F.6010209@postgresql.org> Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 11:12:15 +0800 From: Justin Clift User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030723 Thunderbird/0.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Marc G. Fournier" Cc: Josh Berkus , pgsql-core@postgresql.org, pgsql-www@postgresql.org, Robert Treat Subject: Re: Fwd: RE: PostgreSQL track for PHP Con West References: <200309080855.06643.josh@agliodbs.com> <3F5D2F29.9040906@postgresql.org> <200309081906.05319.josh@agliodbs.com> <20030908231334.S57860@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20030908231334.S57860@ganymede.hub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-INS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-INS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=0, required 5) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200309/51 X-Sequence-Number: 2519 Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Josh Berkus wrote: > > >>Justin, >> >> >>>Most people who signed onto that list did so with the expectation that >>>it would not have um... non-PostgreSQL related stuff going through it. >>>To then allow non-PostgreSQL stuff to go through it in this way feels >>>like it would be a kind of "breech of trust". >> >>But this is PostgreSQL related ... there will be two PostgreSQL segments at >>the convention. And I'll bet that about 1/3 of our users have some >>involvement with PHP .... That's cool then. I just wasn't sure that it would always be PostgreSQL related. :-) Regards and best wishes, Justin Clift >>Certainly it's as relevant as EMS HiTech's monthly version announcements ... > > > Agreed ... and especially considering how hard it is to get 'inroads' into > the PHP community, being seen as sponsors always helps ... >