X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [64.117.224.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8085D1B504 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 03:38:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [64.117.224.130]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 48426-08 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 00:38:01 -0300 (ADT) Received: from pow1.ims.telstra.com.au (pow1.ims.telstra.com.au [203.14.14.252]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6CD60D1B4E8 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 00:37:59 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org (h114-62.ims.telstra.com.au [203.18.114.62]) by pow1.ims.telstra.com.au (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id h8P3eFCQ026021; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 03:40:17 GMT Message-ID: <3F72630F.1030806@postgresql.org> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 11:37:51 +0800 From: Justin Clift User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030901 Thunderbird/0.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: archeron@wavefire.com Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Site looks. References: <200309241351.49617.archeron@wavefire.com> In-Reply-To: <200309241351.49617.archeron@wavefire.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-INS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-INS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=0, required 5) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200309/97 X-Sequence-Number: 2565 Hi Wade, My thought here is that the Advocacy site needs re-doing, as the version that is there was built to be an initial point of reference and not much has been done with it since. (Maintenance of that site is difficult because of the way it's structured). Regards and best wishes, Justin Clift Wade Klaver wrote: > Hello all, > I may be able to wrangle a pro designer into donating some work for us. I > can't guarantee anything at this juncture, but he is willing to help if/when > he has the time. My question is two-fold: What sites do people feel are in > need of the most serious face-lift and how do people feel about a more or > less common theme between all the sites? Currently www, advocacy and > techdocs are all quite different. Also, does anyone have the hi-res original > images for things like the elephant in the diamond, any other PG artwork, > etc?