X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A65DD1C911; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 01:45:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04501-03; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 21:44:53 -0400 (AST) Received: from houston.familyhealth.com.au (fhnet.arach.net.au [203.22.197.21]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2418AD1B57F; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 21:44:49 -0400 (AST) Received: from familyhealth.com.au (work-40.internal [192.168.0.40]) by houston.familyhealth.com.au (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAI1ikoD073914; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 09:44:46 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from chriskl@familyhealth.com.au) Message-ID: <3FB97A5B.5010102@familyhealth.com.au> Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 09:48:11 +0800 From: Christopher Kings-Lynne User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031013 Thunderbird/0.3 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Marc G. Fournier" Cc: Peter Eisentraut , PostgreSQL Development Subject: Re: Release cycle length References: <20031117204606.W731@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20031117204606.W731@ganymede.hub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200311/908 X-Sequence-Number: 47196 > Everyone on -hackers should have been aware of it, as its always > discussed at the end of the previous release cycle ... and I don't think > we've hit a release cycle yet that has actually stayed in the 4 month > period :( Someone is always 'just sitting on something that is almost > done' at the end that pushes it further then originally planned ... I think that the core just need to be tough on it, that's all. If we have pre-published target dates, then everyone knows if they can get their code in or not for that date. Chris