X-Original-To: pgsql-advocacy-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 00847D1B4DD; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 17:52:29 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 81483-05; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 13:51:58 -0400 (AST)
Received: from tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net (tomts25.bellnexxia.net
	[209.226.175.188]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id BA613D1D54E; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 13:51:56 -0400 (AST)
Received: from sympatico.ca ([64.230.164.184]) by tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net
	(InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP
	id <20040111175156.VJMU6920.tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net@sympatico.ca>;
	Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:51:56 -0500
Message-ID: <40018D21.30909@sympatico.ca>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:51:29 -0500
From: Robert Bernier <robert.bernier5@sympatico.ca>
Reply-To: robert.bernier5@sympatico.ca
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
	rv:1.5) Gecko/20031107 Debian/1.5-3
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: (not) powered by PostgreSQL
References: <40014281.4060908@cs.msu.su>
	<20040111124931.H51801@ganymede.hub.org>
	<4001825A.8050705@sympatico.ca>
	<20040111130649.B51801@ganymede.hub.org>
	<4001884E.6080603@sympatico.ca>
	<20040111133431.X51801@ganymede.hub.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040111133431.X51801@ganymede.hub.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Archive-Number: 200401/168
X-Sequence-Number: 3350

Run it like a contract. Just describe how you update and maintain the 
site and ask that all ideas must be compliant with these practices. The 
reward is a 'credit' link.


Marc G. Fournier wrote:

>On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, Robert Bernier wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Actually I was thinking in bigger terms ie: put a new face on the entire
>>website. The person you're originally responding to started out his
>>thread by talking about rebuilding the site. I think that most
>>'ordinary' people have this idea in their head that if a site is good
>>it's because it always changes.
>>
>>Assuming that you are open to the idea it means also that there's a lot
>>of work involved. Why not let other people do it and let them get credit
>>for it? This is what the co-op program is meant to do anyways.
>>    
>>
>
>To be honest ... I think there are about a half dozen ppl looking at
>'re-writing' the site now :(  the big problem I think that ppl are hitting
>righ tnow is "what technology to use" :)  We've had everything from
>OpenACS to Bricolage to straight PHP to ...
>
>Dave, what is the status of Adrian(?)'s work?  Everyone should be back
>from holidays now, no?
>
>Josh/Dave/RobertT ... is what RobertB proposing maybe something that could
>be focused on the Advocacy site itself?
>  
>