X-Original-To: pgsql-advocacy-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11F3D1D896; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:21:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 36926-07; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:21:12 -0400 (AST) Received: from hosting.commandprompt.com (216.commandprompt.com [207.173.200.216]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA9B1D1D88D; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:21:09 -0400 (AST) Received: from commandprompt.com (dsl093-038-087.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.38.87]) (authenticated) by hosting.commandprompt.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i0CJL7g31881; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:21:07 -0800 Message-ID: <4002F39E.4080601@commandprompt.com> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:21:02 -0800 From: "Joshua D. Drake" Organization: Command Prompt, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: robert.bernier5@sympatico.ca Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org Subject: Rewriting the website (was:Re: (not) powered by PostgreSQL) References: <40014281.4060908@cs.msu.su> <20040111124931.H51801@ganymede.hub.org> <4001825A.8050705@sympatico.ca> <20040111130649.B51801@ganymede.hub.org> <4001884E.6080603@sympatico.ca> <20040111133431.X51801@ganymede.hub.org> <40018D21.30909@sympatico.ca> In-Reply-To: <40018D21.30909@sympatico.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200401/200 X-Sequence-Number: 3382 Hello, Personally I think that anything that we code the website in, should be mirrorable. The fact that we have a single point of failure (no offense Marc) and that point have failure has shown itself multiple times in the last twelve months is really a bad thing. Sincerely, Joshua Drake Robert Bernier wrote: > Run it like a contract. Just describe how you update and maintain the > site and ask that all ideas must be compliant with these practices. > The reward is a 'credit' link. > > > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > >> On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, Robert Bernier wrote: >> >> >> >>> Actually I was thinking in bigger terms ie: put a new face on the >>> entire >>> website. The person you're originally responding to started out his >>> thread by talking about rebuilding the site. I think that most >>> 'ordinary' people have this idea in their head that if a site is good >>> it's because it always changes. >>> >>> Assuming that you are open to the idea it means also that there's a lot >>> of work involved. Why not let other people do it and let them get >>> credit >>> for it? This is what the co-op program is meant to do anyways. >>> >> >> >> To be honest ... I think there are about a half dozen ppl looking at >> 're-writing' the site now :( the big problem I think that ppl are >> hitting >> righ tnow is "what technology to use" :) We've had everything from >> OpenACS to Bricolage to straight PHP to ... >> >> Dave, what is the status of Adrian(?)'s work? Everyone should be back >> from holidays now, no? >> >> Josh/Dave/RobertT ... is what RobertB proposing maybe something that >> could >> be focused on the Advocacy site itself? >> >> > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if > your > joining column's datatypes do not match -- Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting. +1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL