X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BCB3D1B4AA; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:46:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25505-01; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 12:45:57 -0400 (AST) Received: from imap.cs.msu.su (imap.cs.msu.su [158.250.10.39]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CDFBD1B49A; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 12:45:56 -0400 (AST) Received: from cs.msu.su (pc724-lin.cmc.msu.ru [10.3.34.136]) by imap.cs.msu.su (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0GGjrsY055721; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 19:45:53 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from borz_off@cs.msu.su) Message-ID: <40081541.3080204@cs.msu.su> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 19:45:53 +0300 From: Alexey Borzov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Marc G. Fournier" Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Requirements for updated site References: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B87204A3@mail.vale-housing.co.uk> <4007DB0B.50903@cs.msu.su> <20040116105054.U45512@ganymede.hub.org> <400806F5.4050709@cs.msu.su> <20040116114953.M13900@ganymede.hub.org> <40080AE1.3000801@cs.msu.su> <20040116121025.E13900@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20040116121025.E13900@ganymede.hub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200401/148 X-Sequence-Number: 3387 Hi! Marc G. Fournier wrote: >>Like, move to a saner color palette from the current week-old-corpse one? ;] > > Look forward to seeing what you have in mind ... I am not a designer. And looking at the archives there were designers who wanted to contribute their work, but were turned down... > BTW, while you are pounding on something that nobody else here seems to > agree about, the rest of us are working on those issues that have been > highlighted as 'needing to do' before we even visit redesigning the site > ... if you want to be helpful, you might want to re-focus your energies on > what has a chance of being done now, instead of beating a dead horse ... > > There are alot of ppl on this list, all of whom have opinions ... some ppl > on this list have been working *with* the rest for several years now ... > each has their own opinions on things, but each works with the rest for > the overall good ... so far, all your threads have amounted to "my way is > right, your way is wrong, let's change to my way" ... > > A site re-design will *not* happen for at least another 6 months, as there > are higher priority things in the works ... now, if you would like to > re-focus your efforts on that in a non-antogonistic way, maybe we can get > those issues resolved and can then focus on a site re-design? Or doesn't > the 'backend stuff' interest you? Marc, with all due respect. I already proposed some backend changes and am willing to start working on them myself. Right now I am waiting for someone to post the data needed to setup a local copy of the server (see topic 'database dump needed, after all', it is not in the archives yet). If you can be that 'someone' (I hope *you* have enough access rights?) then please do so, I'll start hacking on the backend and will not waste the subscribers' time until I have something to show them. Thanks in advance.