X-Original-To: pgsql-advocacy-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2C2D1B4AA; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 19:34:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19445-07; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 15:34:03 -0400 (AST) Received: from gw01.mail.saunalahti.fi (gw01.mail.saunalahti.fi [195.197.172.115]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E985D1B49B; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 15:34:01 -0400 (AST) Received: from bonware.com (support.bonware.com [195.197.228.221]) by gw01.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C3C510B619D; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 21:34:00 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <400C3127.8090107@bonware.com> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 21:33:59 +0200 From: Jussi Mikkola User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Joshua D. Drake" Cc: "scott.marlowe" , 'PostgreSQL General' , Postgresql Advocacy Subject: Re: New PostgreSQL search resource References: <400C29E4.90908@commandprompt.com> In-Reply-To: <400C29E4.90908@commandprompt.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.82.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200401/269 X-Sequence-Number: 3451 I think most of the people use http://www.postgresql.org/search.cgi Default settings, search for select distinct returns in about 10 minutes, with "You haven't typed any word(s) to search for." Same query with match full phrase... (I did not wait long enough. But several minutes in any case. Don't know about the result.) Same query with match full phrase and 7.4 documentation. 2 results in 5 seconds. Results are select into and pg_select. Could we do something to this search? (Change the defaults, divide it to smaller parts, use different search engine...) Rgs, Jussi Joshua D. Drake wrote: > >> Not really. with htdig, I can do "select distinct" on the 7.3 docs >> and I get exactly 7 responses back, and they all have select followed >> immediately by distinct, with only space, CR / LF etc in between. >> >> >> > Well, if you search for select distinct... OpenFTS automatically searches > for select & distinct. My search returned: > > 5 results with the first one being this: > > http://www.commandprompt.com/community//search.lxp?lxpwrap=734/queries-select-lists.html > > > Which seems fairly accurate ;). Perhaps a better description of what > the problem actually is or > the behavior you are expecting? > > SIncerely, > > Joshua D. Drake > > > >> And the & symbol josh recommended shows as being ignored, so that >> didn't work either. >> >> Word combos like "bulk loads" or "run-time configuration" are quite >> handy filters. >> >> > >