X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4567CD1DA83 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 09:08:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00954-09 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 05:08:19 -0400 (AST) Received: from ngate.rdw.ru (mail.rdw.ru [195.42.172.4]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A0D87D1DA57 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 05:08:15 -0400 (AST) Received: (qmail 11685 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2004 09:08:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rdw.ru) (192.168.0.57) by ngate.rdw.ru with SMTP; 14 Feb 2004 09:08:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 30698 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2004 09:01:43 -0000 Received: from ppp01.rdw.ru (HELO cs.msu.su) ([192.168.0.7]) (envelope-sender ) by rdw.ru (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 14 Feb 2004 09:01:42 -0000 Message-ID: <402DE581.6030905@cs.msu.su> Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 12:08:17 +0300 From: Alexey Borzov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: ru, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai Cc: Dave Page , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Another update on 'portal' References: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889F32A@mail.vale-housing.co.uk> <402DDD5C.3070000@cs.msu.su> <20040214085158.GA47127@nexus.ninth-circle.org> In-Reply-To: <20040214085158.GA47127@nexus.ninth-circle.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200402/70 X-Sequence-Number: 3635 Hi! Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote: > people are not machines. Sending email does not per se mean that a > person will respond the same day, let alone the same week. People have > lives, both when at work and when at home. > You don't know their situation so labelling any 'accusations' against > their not responding never works. Please re-read my email. There are no accusations, I just pointed out that polite messages get no response, while impolite draw a lot of responses from the same *very busy* people. Your example shows this once again: you didn't comment on the actual code I did, but were ready to chime in with a lesson in style. Wanna draw some conclusions?.. > On a related side note: what's with the rush anyway? Life's too short > to spend constantly behind computers all day. ;) That's precisely the reason I want to get the response as soon as possible, while I'm still *willing* to spend some time behind computer.