X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89A7ED1DA5F for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 19:21:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08673-03 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 15:21:17 -0400 (AST) Received: from ngate.rdw.ru (mail.rdw.ru [195.42.172.4]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 95505D1DA57 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 15:21:16 -0400 (AST) Received: (qmail 544 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2004 19:21:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rdw.ru) (192.168.0.57) by ngate.rdw.ru with SMTP; 14 Feb 2004 19:21:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 21571 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2004 19:14:41 -0000 Received: from ppp01.rdw.ru (HELO cs.msu.su) ([192.168.0.7]) (envelope-sender ) by rdw.ru (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 14 Feb 2004 19:14:38 -0000 Message-ID: <402E752B.40001@cs.msu.su> Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 22:21:15 +0300 From: Alexey Borzov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: ru, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Treat Cc: Dave Page , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: development questions References: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889F342@mail.vale-housing.co.uk> <402DF278.5020600@cs.msu.su> <50247.80.177.99.193.1076772033.squirrel@ssl.vale-housing.co.uk> <200402141231.59454.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: <200402141231.59454.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200402/80 X-Sequence-Number: 3645 Hi! Robert Treat wrote: >>No. CVS access and user accounts are only given to people following >>continued good quality work over a period of time. > > and people who we know we can work with in a non-abrasive manner. Got the point. ;] >>>4) Is there any checklist for rolling out the "new" website? >> >>No - that depends very much on what is required to rollout any new code. > > Dave, I'm thinking we could probably put his code on a new virtual test > domain, though I'd like to look through the code more before we get to that > step, but it seems like a good next step... Yes, that's exactly what I want right now --- look through my code. >>>5) Are you familiar with Jakob Nielsen's writings? >> >>Nope. > > I am. Actually I used to be the user experience advocate for a large recruting > company. I've noticed It's tough to convince developers to go with his > recomendations sometimes :-) I wanted to know whether the people on this maillist are aware of "usability" stuff. 'Cause unfortunately the current website badly breaks some of the well-respected guidelines. >>>6) Do you know any professional web-designers? >> >>Yes. Why? > > maybe he has money to hire some one? :-) No, I don't. ;] But I think that there are some people on the maillists (or some personal acquaintances) who would be willing to contribute their work for free.