public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Neil Conway <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal -- Summary to date
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 16:26:01 -0500
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>

Josh Berkus wrote:
> D. One possible reservation may be integrating RT with GForge.

I'm confused. Are we considering moving core backend development over 
to GForge as well, or just GBorg? (Personally the former doesn't 
strike me as a good idea, at least initially.)

> I think that the PostgreSQL project would be very much sending the 
> wrong message to use an effectively non-Postgres tool.

Frankly, I think the PostgreSQL project would be sending "the wrong 
message" if we chose our tools on any basis other than functionality. 
We ought to use what works, whether it supports PG or not. Whether the 
bug tracker tool uses PostgreSQL, flat files or MS Access to store 
data is entirely secondary to whether it serves the needs of the 
development group.

-Neil

view thread (58+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal -- Summary to date
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox