X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 797E5D1BA2E for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 19:22:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27472-10 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:22:38 -0400 (AST) Received: from ngate.rdw.ru (mail.rdw.ru [195.42.172.4]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 72DABD1B979 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:22:34 -0400 (AST) Received: (qmail 15337 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2004 19:22:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rdw.ru) (192.168.0.57) by ngate.rdw.ru with SMTP; 9 Mar 2004 19:22:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 350 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2004 19:22:22 -0000 Received: from ppp01.rdw.ru (HELO cs.msu.su) ([192.168.0.7]) (envelope-sender ) by rdw.ru (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 9 Mar 2004 19:22:21 -0000 Message-ID: <404E1978.9080603@cs.msu.su> Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 22:22:32 +0300 From: Alexey Borzov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: ru, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Treat Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Update on 'portal' changes References: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889F5D3@mail.vale-housing.co.uk> <404CAE83.80104@cs.msu.su> <1078783781.22416.251.camel@camel> <1078788127.22416.327.camel@camel> <404DD596.3040702@cs.msu.su> <1078844674.2753.348.camel@camel> In-Reply-To: <1078844674.2753.348.camel@camel> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200403/83 X-Sequence-Number: 3899 Hi! Robert Treat wrote: >>>I guess we're still trying to decide if he can save us valuable time :-) >> >>Ahem. I'd learn that my work is not needed *now* rather than later, when >> I've spent more time on it... > > No, the work is needed now, and quite frankly I have more faith that > you'll get it done than I do that we will, at least anytime soon. It's > just that we keep going round and round on the whole "working together" > thing... Seems like you are bent on teaching me about how Open Source works once again... I already learned that this "working together" thing requires *mutual* desire to, uhm, work together. If such a desire is not found on one side, then this side can come up with really inventive excuses. Consider: Marc had some disagreements with me, too. But I already have a development server set up at postgresql.org domain. On the other hand *you* write "I wouldn't necessarily be opposed to giving you (Alexy) cvs commit privileges except that you have a tendency to fly off the handle that makes me a little bit nervous..." Are you *this* afraid of me defacing postgresql.org?.. ;] > a similar issue came up on interfaces, with libtcl. A new guy > had a bunch of patches he wanted to submit but the project maintainers > had been idle for awhile, so he wanted to take over the project. The > admins stated they wanted to stay on, so he forked the project... all > bad imho. ISTM that when your new to a project, you should assume that > you don't know as much as folks that are currently running things. Oh, yeah. Reading the current traffic I got the impression that the folks who are running things know as little as myself. What's up with techdocs? What is this PGFoundry thing? Why is search broken? ;]