X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 826E8D1DCEB for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 07:16:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 80315-09 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 03:16:48 -0400 (AST) Received: from ngate.rdw.ru (mail.rdw.ru [195.42.172.4]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 11E29D1BB5F for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 03:16:46 -0400 (AST) Received: (qmail 30008 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2004 07:16:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rdw.ru) (192.168.0.57) by ngate.rdw.ru with SMTP; 10 Mar 2004 07:16:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 18489 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2004 07:16:34 -0000 Received: from ppp01.rdw.ru (HELO cs.msu.su) ([192.168.0.7]) (envelope-sender ) by rdw.ru (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 10 Mar 2004 07:16:33 -0000 Message-ID: <404EC0DF.1000605@cs.msu.su> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 10:16:47 +0300 From: Alexey Borzov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: ru, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Treat Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Update on 'portal' changes References: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889F5D3@mail.vale-housing.co.uk> <404CAE83.8 0104@cs.msu.su> <1078783781.22416.251.camel@camel> <1078788127.22416.327.camel@camel> <404DD596.3040702@cs.msu.su> <1078844674.2753.348.camel@camel> <404E1978.9080603@cs.msu.su> <1078869190.2753.420.camel@camel> In-Reply-To: <1078869190.2753.420.camel@camel> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200403/95 X-Sequence-Number: 3911 Hi! Robert Treat wrote: >>Oh, yeah. Reading the current traffic I got the impression that the folks who >>are running things know as little as myself. What's up with techdocs? What is >>this PGFoundry thing? Why is search broken? ;] > > And some people want us to be even *more* segregated... You can't be even *more* segregated. There already are two distinct groups: the so-called "website team" that doesn't have a slightest clue what's up with the websites and the people who actually do the work. I feel that I'd rather align myself with the latter.