X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E1CD1DB0C for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 17:16:18 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16312-06 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 17:16:19 -0300 (ADT) Received: from ngate.rdw.ru (mail.rdw.ru [195.42.172.4]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 00CA1D1D067 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 17:16:16 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail 21752 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2004 20:16:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rdw.ru) (192.168.0.57) by ngate.rdw.ru with SMTP; 21 Apr 2004 20:16:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 1820 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2004 20:16:16 -0000 Received: from ppp01.rdw.ru (HELO cs.msu.su) ([192.168.0.7]) (envelope-sender ) by rdw.ru (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 21 Apr 2004 20:16:15 -0000 Message-ID: <4086D679.3010106@cs.msu.su> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 00:15:53 +0400 From: Alexey Borzov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: ru, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Treat Cc: Dave Page , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: progress update, some questions References: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889FAEE@mail.vale-housing.co.uk> <200404211310.58889.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: <200404211310.58889.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200404/194 X-Sequence-Number: 4298 Hi! Robert Treat wrote: >>>3) There is *no* moderation at all for the doc comments, I >>>suppose? You know why PHP's have such a good signal-to-noise >>>ratio? Here is the >>>reason: http://lists.php.net/group.php?group=php.notes >> >>There is no moderation, though I believe some of the docs guys go >>through them before any releases to incorporate anything useful. >> >>Feel free to add some moderation if you like - an email to the list with >>a link to an 'approve' script in /admin would do the job I guess. > > Something I've been thinking of adding to our current admin stuff is an > automatic email of actual approvals of news/events; I see they do something > similar on the php docs by emailing out any changes, I'd really like to have > that feature included if we add moderation tech to our docs. Before I actually start working on admin pages: what exactly do you want sent to the list? 1) News items/events added (like it is done now). 2) Approvals of news/events (automatically, unlike now). 3) Added doc comments. 4) Approved/deleted doc comments.