X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07450D1C9B7
	for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 23 Apr 2004 09:43:47 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 99936-01
	for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 23 Apr 2004 09:43:48 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from imap.cs.msu.su (imap.cs.msu.su [158.250.10.39])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C8D5D1BAD6
	for <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 09:43:44 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from cs.msu.su (pc724-lin.cmc.msu.ru [10.3.34.136])
	by imap.cs.msu.su (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i3NChkMt057226;
	Fri, 23 Apr 2004 16:43:46 +0400 (MSD)
	(envelope-from borz_off@cs.msu.su)
Message-ID: <40890F7B.1000006@cs.msu.su>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 16:43:39 +0400
From: Alexey Borzov <borz_off@cs.msu.su>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040310
X-Accept-Language: ru, en, en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>, pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: progress update, some questions
References: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889FAEE@mail.vale-housing.co.uk>
	<200404211310.58889.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
	<4086D679.3010106@cs.msu.su> <1082666474.23008.1038.camel@camel>
In-Reply-To: <1082666474.23008.1038.camel@camel>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040402,
	clamav-milter version 0.70a
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests=
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200404/199
X-Sequence-Number: 4303

Hi!

Robert Treat wrote:
>>3) Added doc comments.
>>4) Approved/deleted doc comments.
> 
> The only concern I would have about these would be to make sure that we
> have enough qualified people to handle these appropriatly here. Peter,
> you do a lot of the doc oriented stuff, do you have any input on the
> above two?  Would it be better if they went to the docs list? 

BTW, in such a case there will immediately be a need to give different 
access rights to different people...