X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35231D1E23A for ; Wed, 12 May 2004 14:50:08 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20571-09 for ; Wed, 12 May 2004 14:49:47 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hueymiccailhuitl.mtu.ru (hueytecuilhuitl.mtu.ru [195.34.32.123]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B422BD1DDF3 for ; Wed, 12 May 2004 14:49:45 -0300 (ADT) Received: from cs.msu.su (ppp149-14.dialup.mtu-net.ru [62.118.149.14]) by hueymiccailhuitl.mtu.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CDE7159157; Wed, 12 May 2004 21:49:44 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from borz_off@cs.msu.su) Message-ID: <40A26393.1010909@cs.msu.su> Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 21:49:07 +0400 From: Alexey Borzov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: ru, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Treat Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Status update on "new" website, testing needed References: <40A133D8.7080509@cs.msu.su> <1084369554.14683.2552.camel@camel> In-Reply-To: <1084369554.14683.2552.camel@camel> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_SORBS X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200405/37 X-Sequence-Number: 4416 Hi! Robert Treat wrote: > Are you interested in nit picking or should we just wait on that and/or > submit patches ourselves? For example, I like the layout of the old > news admin interface better.... id number,date,headline,yes/no on status > info, translations,edit,delete being more boxy and filling up browser > page... obviously a minor thing but would be nice. This is controlled by the templates in portal/template/admin Yes, feel free to provide patches. ;] > Another thing I was wondering about. Once an article is translated, if > someone goes back in and edits the original article, should it mark the > article as not translated? That is how I did it on the advocacy site... > well, actually I kept track of it the item was either new (never > translated) or stale (needed updating but had been translated.) Oh, you are right here. I think a timestamp is needed in the table containing texts and a trigger to change that on update. Then it'll be possible to check whether the master was modified after the translation and mark this fact. > On the doc comment interface, what is the difference between rejected > and deleted? Maybe that's not the right question... when would I want to > reject a comment and not delete it? Also we used to be able to edit > comments on the doc page themselves which was handy to see the comment > in context, any chance we can still do that? Deleted comments are, um, deleted. Rejected are marked but kept in the DB, they are obviously not shown on the site. If you feel that it's not needed, I'll leave only the 'delete' option. I didn't see anything for editing the comments in the current site's code, BTW. > Oh, and one other thing, how do we add a new language? I'd like to walk > through that process if I could. Manually, by adding the language to the array[s] in portal/system/global/languages.php > Hmm... since none of the above are bugs... go to documentation section > and click on the FAQ/PDF links, I notice they are broken. :-) Otherwise > everything else seemed pretty functional... great job That's once again a content issue. ;]