X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A4DD1B381
	for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:10:10 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 84830-08
	for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 13 Jul 2004 15:10:09 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from imap.cs.msu.su (imap.cs.msu.su [158.250.10.39])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5A8D1B374
	for <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:10:05 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from cs.msu.su (pc724-lin.cmc.msu.ru [10.3.34.136])
	by imap.cs.msu.su (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6DFA2vR097995;
	Tue, 13 Jul 2004 19:10:03 +0400 (MSD)
	(envelope-from borz_off@cs.msu.su)
Message-ID: <40F3FB52.9020807@cs.msu.su>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 19:10:10 +0400
From: Alexey Borzov <borz_off@cs.msu.su>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
	rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
X-Accept-Language: ru, en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Time for a separate training section?
References: <200407130004.27667.peter_e@gmx.net>
	<1089674868.15551.153.camel@camel>
In-Reply-To: <1089674868.15551.153.camel@camel>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.73, clamav-milter version 0.73a
	on imap.cs.msu.su
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests=
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200407/54
X-Sequence-Number: 4724

Hi,

Robert Treat wrote:
>>It seems that most of the events lately are training courses.  That's 
>>great of course.  But the "real" events are getting kind of lost on the 
>>web site.  Some people date their event over 6 months, so it always 
>>stays on top and the real upcoming events never move up.  And some 
>>training courses are repeating, but that can't be reflected accurately.  
>>Maybe training courses should be listed in a different section with a 
>>slightly different arrangement?
> 
> I would be for it. Alexy, how difficult is this to do in the
> next-generation site? 

It depends. Do we need a completely different approach from the events, 
or will we live with a pair of radiobuttons: event / training?

P.S. I am "Alexy" and our favourite database is "Postgre".