X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DDBE5E3639 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:39:18 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14488-04 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:39:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ngate.rdw.ru (mail.rdw.ru [195.42.172.4]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8CC625E46F2 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:39:07 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail 23425 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2004 14:39:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rdw.ru) (192.168.0.57) by ngate.rdw.ru with SMTP; 16 Aug 2004 14:39:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 19007 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2004 14:39:02 -0000 Received: from ppp01.rdw.ru (HELO [192.168.0.7]) ([192.168.0.7]) (envelope-sender ) by rdw.ru (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 16 Aug 2004 14:39:01 -0000 Message-ID: <4120C711.6000403@cs.msu.su> Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:39:13 +0400 From: Alexey Borzov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 X-Accept-Language: ru, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Treat Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: time to move to the new code References: <200408140106.51527.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: <200408140106.51527.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200408/148 X-Sequence-Number: 4923 Hi, Robert Treat wrote: > Well, the design doesn't get done and the code gets > more out of synch as maintainance on the live site rolls on, One has to wonder why people doing maintenance do not update the new version as well... > so I think we > need to bite the bullet and move to the new code. Once it is in place we > should be able to make deisng changes much easier anyway, after all that is > part of the point of the new code. Are there any open items that would > prevent us from making the switch? The new site is online, as you know: http://alexey.beta.postgresql.org I'd be very grateful if someone went over it and wrote down all the open items and differences to the current site. The code was ready ~ 2 months ago, and I was asking for the input back then: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-www/2004-06/msg00088.php