X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5AF329C82
	for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:52:58 +0100 (BST)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 34880-05
	for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:52:51 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from imap.cs.msu.su (imap.cs.msu.su [158.250.10.39])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AA16329C89
	for <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:52:52 +0100 (BST)
Received: from cs.msu.su (pc724-lin.cmc.msu.ru [10.3.34.136])
	by imap.cs.msu.su (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8ABqg08006047;
	Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:52:42 +0400 (MSD)
	(envelope-from borz_off@cs.msu.su)
Message-ID: <414195B2.7070600@cs.msu.su>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:53:22 +0400
From: Alexey Borzov <borz_off@cs.msu.su>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
	rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
X-Accept-Language: ru, en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Glaesemann <grzm@myrealbox.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>,
	lark@no1-else.com, Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
Subject: Re: New website design
References: 
 <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E41A79DC@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk>
	<414192D0.60800@cs.msu.su>
	<6DFA7A64-031F-11D9-A626-000A95C88220@myrealbox.com>
In-Reply-To: <6DFA7A64-031F-11D9-A626-000A95C88220@myrealbox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.75.1, clamav-milter version 0.75c
	on imap.cs.msu.su
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests=
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200409/71
X-Sequence-Number: 5141

Hi,

Michael Glaesemann wrote:
>> Can I also have Photoshop source? For obvious reasons, I'd prefer 
>> working with it rather than editing .jpg images.
> 
> 
> Do you think it would be feasible to use png on the site rather than 
> jpeg? Or are there too many browsers out there that can't handle png?

Yes, that's one of the reasons I'd like to have Photoshop source.

There are some browsers that can't handle PNG alpha transparency, but I 
don't think that'll be used.