X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F92E329CB0; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 09:06:18 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 55855-07; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 08:06:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dic-mail.telstra.net (crash.telstra.net [203.50.0.185]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8AB0329E82; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 09:06:10 +0100 (BST) Received: from [203.50.0.197] (rsdhcp5.telstra.net [203.50.0.197]) by dic-mail.telstra.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8R867wD026313; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 18:06:08 +1000 Message-ID: <4157C9F3.9020302@postgresql.org> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 18:06:11 +1000 From: Justin Clift User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Marc G. Fournier" Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Anything "time" critical on www.postgresql.org VM? References: <20040926162636.K22056@ganymede.hub.org> <4157474E.5000803@postgresql.org> <20040926204344.C30067@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20040926204344.C30067@ganymede.hub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200409/179 X-Sequence-Number: 5249 Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Justin Clift wrote: >> Hi Marc, >> >> What kind of replication is being used? > > rsync right now, unless you know of something better that works under > FreeBSD? I'd love to find something more 'real time', but haven't been > able to find anything that could be run on an existing server ... Oh well, it sounds like it'll have to do. They use rsync here too for file based syncronisation. It get's bitched and moaned about, but "does the job". Regards and best wishes, Justin Clift