X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC7B329EE1
	for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:51:49 +0100 (BST)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 29431-03
	for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 27 Sep 2004 15:51:45 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.iinet.net.au (mail-07.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.39])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 057ED329EB8
	for <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:51:42 +0100 (BST)
Received: (qmail 20448 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2004 15:51:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.10.3?) (203.173.11.223)
	by mail.iinet.net.au with SMTP; 27 Sep 2004 15:51:40 -0000
Message-ID: <4158370B.7020904@postgresql.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 01:51:39 +1000
From: Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
Cc: John Hansen <john@geeknet.com.au>, pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Anything "time" critical on www.postgresql.org VM?
References: <5066E5A966339E42AA04BA10BA706AE561A7@rodrick.geeknet.com.au>
	<20040927104808.M30067@ganymede.hub.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040927104808.M30067@ganymede.hub.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests=
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200409/184
X-Sequence-Number: 5254

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
<snip>
> Using rsync, and some mods that Andrea (oicu) helped me with to 
> parrallelize it, I've been able to get granularity down to 5 minutes 
> instead of 15, at least based on 4 VMs right now taking ~150 seconds 
> total to keep in sync ...

Hmmm... I wonder if it'd be possible to use that PG backed filesystem 
someone created a while ago, then use PG replication (Slony, etc) to 
just replicate that?

:)

(Ok, prob not feasible, but it's an interesting thought)

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift