X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A67032A034; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:57:05 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 49011-09; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:56:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from busybox.pixar.com (busybox.pixar.com [138.72.18.213]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E14329F48; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:56:45 +0100 (BST) Received: from pixar.com (dreadnok.pixar.com [138.72.16.110]) by busybox.pixar.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i8TNuP2A017448; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:56:25 -0700 Message-ID: <415B4BA9.4090703@pixar.com> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:56:25 -0700 From: Mark Harrison User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040316 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Momjian Cc: PostgreSQL www , PostgreSQL advocacy Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Server unreliability References: <200409291713.i8THDLn14086@candle.pha.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <200409291713.i8THDLn14086@candle.pha.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200409/255 X-Sequence-Number: 5326 Bruce Momjian wrote: > It is my opinion that we have to make major changes in the way we > provide hosting for our servers. There are several problems: > > o Location of servers > > The location of our servers in Panama is a problem. They are too far > for any PostgreSQL maintainers to access. Changing hardware or > diagnosing problems has been too hard. I have had like 2 days of > downtime on my home machine in the past 12 years. We have had more than > 2 days of downtime in the past 6 months. My wife would not accept such > a reliability level. > > o FreeBSD > > The use of FreeBSD jails can cause servers to take +8 hours to fsck on a > server crash or power failure. Again, I would never accept such > problems on my home server so it is hard to fathom how a project with > thousands of users can accept that. Either we need to find a fix, stop > using jails, or get another operating system, but continuing to use a > setup with a known problem is just asking for trouble. > > o Web site > > We have been talking about a new web page layout for years at this > point. I almost don't care if they just put a dancing bear up on the > web site. Let's do something! > > o Archives > > The archives situation is a continual problem. Again, maybe a dancing > bear can help. :-) > > Basically, with no money and no one offering servers, I don't see a good > solution to any of these problems, but I think we need to recognize > these are problems and that we will continue to suffer until they are > addressed. > > Are there any proposals, no matter how radical, to correct these? Here are a few radical ideas... The basic idea is to leverage as many outside resources as possible. 1. Move primary file downloads to sourceforge. That should reduce the traffic load a lot. 2. Move the mailing lists to a mailing list server (e.g. yahoo). 3. Base the new website on a blog-style package that makes it easy to update for multiple people (disclaimer, I don't know what the current site is running, so maybe that's already been done). 4. For the website, concentrate on simple static pages that can be served efficiently. 5. I like the google ads idea, it will possibly generate a bit of money and connect people with organizations interested in postgresql. All just IMHO, and with immense gratitude for all the work that's already been done! Mark -- Mark Harrison Pixar Animation Studios