X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0598A32A281 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 23:31:26 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 40251-06 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:31:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.iinet.net.au (mail-10.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.42]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC29632A226 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 23:31:19 +0100 (BST) Received: (qmail 27795 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2004 22:30:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.10.3?) (203.217.56.165) by mail.iinet.net.au with SMTP; 19 Oct 2004 22:30:57 -0000 Message-ID: <41759599.3050000@postgresql.org> Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 08:30:49 +1000 From: Justin Clift User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PostgreSQL www Cc: "Joshua D. Drake" , "Marc G. Fournier" Subject: Re: mailing list offer References: <41746DC7.2060003@commandprompt.com> <20041018230703.K69729@ganymede.hub.org> <41747A7D.20003@postgresql.org> In-Reply-To: <41747A7D.20003@postgresql.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200410/199 X-Sequence-Number: 5593 Justin Clift wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> >> Thanks, but the mailing lists are fine where they currently are ... >> there are no current plans to move them ... > > Actually, it's an interesting thought and once in place it would free up > people's time for other stuff. I'm interested in what other people's opinion on this is. Personally, I feel this is worth considering because it gives us more practice at getting existing PG companies further involved, and Command Prompt is a relatively safe bet here. That's a good thing I feel, because we'll likely get further offers as PG gains wider usage. ? Regards and best wishes, Justin Clift