X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39EB3A3BDA for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2004 13:09:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 35677-10 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2004 13:09:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from imap.cs.msu.su (imap.cs.msu.su [158.250.10.39]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73A1D3A3C80 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2004 13:09:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [10.3.34.136] (pc724-lin.cmc.msu.ru [10.3.34.136]) by imap.cs.msu.su (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iA2D8Aem006659; Tue, 2 Nov 2004 16:08:10 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from borz_off@cs.msu.su) Message-ID: <41878616.70705@cs.msu.su> Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 16:05:26 +0300 From: Alexey Borzov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910 X-Accept-Language: ru, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Page Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Inadequate hosting for www.postgresql.org? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.80/568/Tue Nov 2 09:43:35 2004 clamav-milter version 0.80j on imap.cs.msu.su X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200411/19 X-Sequence-Number: 5750 Hi, Dave Page wrote: >>Looking into this stuff offlist highlighted the following obvious >>problem: postgresql.org (as well as wwwdevel) runs on a >>shared server that has *lots* of other tasks that can >>negatively affect performance. >>It is difficult to even point finger at one particular task >>that does this. >> >>So the solution (as was also pointed out in a private mail to >>me) is to get a dedicated server for running the "master" website. > > > A /dedicated/ server is *way* over the top as I pointed out in my > previous private message to you. The current site regens all 7000+ pages > in a few minutes for example. I agree though that we could use a little > more horsepower though - I'll see if I can setup something on one of my > boxes here over the next few days. "Dedicated" does not necessarily mean "dedicated to www only", but "dedicated to PostgreSQL project". Current infrastructure with shared servers was already found inadequate to run search, archives, etc.