X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A0143A3E73; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 20:19:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 69807-08; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 20:19:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tetra.ehpg.net (tetra.ehpg.net [216.218.206.34]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3228E3A3CB7; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 20:19:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [66.63.169.28] (helo=[66.63.169.28]) by tetra.ehpg.net with asmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CShtC-0005MD-0H; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 12:19:23 -0800 Message-ID: <41951A3E.4070108@ehpg.net> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 12:17:02 -0800 From: "Gavin M. Roy" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Marc G. Fournier" Cc: Robert Treat , Dave Page , Omar Kilani , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Alternate PostgreSQL.org Design References: <41950302.3030503@ehpg.net> <1100288278.5493.99.camel@camel> <4195136F.7030702@ehpg.net> <20041112160859.G3792@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20041112160859.G3792@ganymede.hub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_NJABL_SPAM, RCVD_IN_SBL X-Spam-Level: * X-Archive-Number: 200411/162 X-Sequence-Number: 5893 I'm not talking about opening it to input and design suggestions, i'm talking about a vote: A if you like the design at url1 B if you like the design at url2 Not open ended, not allowing for people to say "yeah but do this or do that" Gavin Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Gavin M. Roy wrote: > >> >>> Sorry, but the site has goals of things it needs to accomplish and that >>> goes beyond "looking cool". I've worked in usability and information >>> architecture and know the things that need to be accomplished with an >>> organizations main website and if you leave it up to the general public >>> your looking for trouble. >>> Robert Treat >>> >> Appearance and usability are both important factors. Are you saying >> that people outside of -www are not capable of judging both? > > > The wider the audience, the harder it becomes to come to a consensus > ... those that are interested in the web site developments have/should > join the -www list, just like you did, and put in their 2 cents ... > > ---- > Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services > (http://www.hub.org) > Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: > 7615664 > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if > your > joining column's datatypes do not match