X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09DB93A48B3
	for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 19 Nov 2004 23:34:29 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 42899-06
	for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 19 Nov 2004 23:34:18 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.iinet.net.au (mail-09.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.41])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 274263A46A2
	for <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 23:34:17 +0000 (GMT)
Received: (qmail 2393 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2004 23:34:16 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.10.3?) (203.217.57.159)
	by mail.iinet.net.au with SMTP; 19 Nov 2004 23:34:16 -0000
Message-ID: <419E82FB.8050408@postgresql.org>
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 10:34:19 +1100
From: Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
Cc: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>,
	Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>,
	Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Vote on Omar Design
References: <200411181953.10646.josh@agliodbs.com>
	<1100882015.389.98.camel@camel>
	<419E2220.4080208@commandprompt.com>
	<1100889121.388.103.camel@camel> <419E421B.60306@commandprompt.com>
	<20041119151732.W75727@ganymede.hub.org>
In-Reply-To: <20041119151732.W75727@ganymede.hub.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests=
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200411/265
X-Sequence-Number: 5996

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
<snip>
> The thing is, we already have a new design 
> (http://wwwdevel.postgresql.org/) ... so its not 'a design' that is 
> holding things up ...

Cool.  I hadn't checked that recently, and it looks a lot better than I 
remembered.  Lucasz' design looks ok too.

Omar's design does look better than Lucasz' one, and is in line with the 
newer websites created for the Mozilla project.  But, they're both large 
improvements over the present design, so choosing either will be a good 
step ahead.

Out of the two, I'd pick Omar's one, but I'm not hugely bothered either 
way. ;)

Personally, I think it would be a good idea to add this vote to the main 
PG front page survey/poll thing:

***********

"Which proposed PG website do you prefer?"

+ Don't care
+ Lucasz (with it linked)
+ Omar's (with it linked)

***********

The "Don't care" at the top is to stop people mis-voting by hitting the 
button without choosing.  We could even put a news item at the top too, 
linked so that people can vote through that.

Worth doing?  I update the poll on the PG site if it is.

:)

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift



> ----
> Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
> Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
>      joining column's datatypes do not match