X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4425D3A5077
	for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Sun, 21 Nov 2004 23:03:19 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 89093-04
	for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Sun, 21 Nov 2004 23:03:09 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.iinet.net.au (mail-06.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.38])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2EEEF3A4D9A
	for <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 23:03:09 +0000 (GMT)
Received: (qmail 20629 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2004 23:03:06 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.139?) (203.173.11.78)
	by mail.iinet.net.au with SMTP; 21 Nov 2004 23:03:06 -0000
Message-ID: <41A11EB5.5090503@postgresql.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 10:03:17 +1100
From: Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Vote on Omar Design
References: 
 <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E430725A@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: 
 <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E430725A@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests=
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200411/309
X-Sequence-Number: 6040

Dave Page wrote:
<snip>
> Not without a stable version of Lukasz' design someplace. I will
> probably be hacking wwwdevel about over the next few evening whilst I
> look into mirroring it properly.

Ok.  I can snapshot it and put it on the web somewhere if needed.


> What about counting the votes here first?

We can do that, but as this team is the decision makers I reckon it'd be 
more useful to get a vote of end users before we make a vote.

I'm thinking of the end user survey more as feedback and an indicator to 
us, rather than a "gee, design XYZ won by a single vote so we should use 
that" type of thing.  This way, we get to see if there is a dramatic 
preference or not before we make a decision, but we're not bound by it.

:)

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift


> /D