X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 510C43A50AD for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 00:28:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05612-10 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 00:28:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tetra.ehpg.net (tetra.ehpg.net [216.218.206.34]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB06E3A50A9 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 00:28:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from adsl-221-163-226.pns.bellsouth.net ([68.221.163.226] helo=[192.168.1.97]) by tetra.ehpg.net with asmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CW24O-0003dA-ER; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 16:28:41 -0800 Message-ID: <41A1329E.8070509@ehpg.net> Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 18:28:14 -0600 From: "Gavin M. Roy" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: josh@agliodbs.com Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Counting clicks, Download page? References: <200411211611.51099.josh@agliodbs.com> In-Reply-To: <200411211611.51099.josh@agliodbs.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200411/312 X-Sequence-Number: 6043 Maybe a good way is to create a simple perl script that counts out of some standard logfile formats and provides the numbers in a file that would be accessable but hidden in the ftp file structure... maybe .stats or something... then we could easily make a ftp script to retrive the information for a stats page. If we agree that it's something that we'll ask/require our mirrors to use on a crontab, I'll be happy to code something that works against proftp and apache, with abstraction for the regex to split out the data. Gavin Josh Berkus wrote: >Folks, > >Is there any way we can log the number of times people request an FTP mirror >from the download mirrors page? While it wouldn't be an accurate count of >downloads, it would give us better numbers than we have now. > >Thoughts? > > >