X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA813A5093 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 06:13:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 81191-03 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 06:13:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.iinet.net.au (mail-08.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.40]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E3E23A5038 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 06:13:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: (qmail 8149 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2004 06:13:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.10.3?) (203.173.26.207) by mail.iinet.net.au with SMTP; 29 Nov 2004 06:13:36 -0000 Message-ID: <41AABE08.6020709@postgresql.org> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 17:13:28 +1100 From: Justin Clift User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Momjian Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , Tom Lane , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ... References: <200411290203.iAT23sk04399@candle.pha.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <200411290203.iAT23sk04399@candle.pha.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200411/1114 X-Sequence-Number: 61686 Bruce Momjian wrote: > Should I add a TODO to warn if FSM values are too small? Is that doable? It sounds like it should be, and it would be a valuable pointer to people, so yep. Any idea who'd be interested in claiming it? Regards and best wishes, Justin Clift