X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C9EE3A5F47 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 16:16:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 82488-10 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 16:16:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tetra.ehpg.net (tetra.ehpg.net [216.218.206.34]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACAB93A5F46 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 16:16:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ppp-68-122-211-163.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net ([68.122.211.163] helo=[172.16.1.36]) by tetra.ehpg.net with asmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CbLXU-0005dP-Sd; Mon, 06 Dec 2004 08:16:41 -0800 Message-ID: <41B485F0.9040706@ehpg.net> Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 08:16:48 -0800 From: "Gavin M. Roy" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Page Cc: Alexey Borzov , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: New site - minor problem References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200412/98 X-Sequence-Number: 6217 Two things, I have the resources to host it, and I would be happy to donate my apache module "Paleface IP2C" which can do IP2Country lookups with very little overhead. With it installed there should be very little overhead in IP2Country lookups (read 100's of times faster) than anything else I've played with module, or php based. On a P4-3ghz one can expect lookups in the 0.0007 second range. Gavin Dave Page wrote: > > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Alexey Borzov [mailto:borz_off@cs.msu.su] >>Sent: 06 December 2004 13:19 >>To: Dave Page >>Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org >>Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] New site - minor problem >> >>Ok, I see. >> >>But then I have another question: why are we moving the >>dynamic site from one inadequate server (due to overload) to >>the other (due to bandwidth limits)? >> >> > >Bandwidth should not be an issue except for *possibly* the ip2country >thing, which as I've stated on a number of occasions is, in my opinion, >a lot of overhead for very little gain on any server. > >Regardless however, I doubt 2megs will cause any problems - like I said, >I'm being cautious. > > > >>Especially when there >>were proposals of better hosting options on this list? >> >> > >None that I'm aware of that gave us the level of control over software >installation/backups etc. that we like. > >Regards, Dave. > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org > >