X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 555163A5FE3 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 20:10:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 66469-07 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 20:10:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zotz.mtu.ru (zotz.mtu.ru [195.34.34.227]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BFB53A414A for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 20:10:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [62.118.142.27] (ppp142-27.dialup.mtu-net.ru [62.118.142.27]) by smtp.MTU.RU (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E5E34E3826; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 23:10:31 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from borz_off@cs.msu.su) Message-ID: <41B4BCB6.8060309@cs.msu.su> Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 23:10:30 +0300 From: Alexey Borzov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910 X-Accept-Language: ru, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Treat Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: launching new site References: <200412060100.33411.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> <41B41293.7030908@cs.msu.su> <200412060832.20564.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: <200412060832.20564.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.28 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200412/111 X-Sequence-Number: 6230 Hi, Robert Treat wrote: >>That's a nice way to convince people: "either you take our design as is or >>you don't get any content updates". > > Not at all. We have already recieved some content updates from Omar, and we > have all of Omar's current code from his SVN repository. If someone wants to > take his content changes and fit them in to the current design, we can do > that. Yes, and given the history of web team's enthusiasm for such tasks I'd guess that no one will ever do that. So we have a de-facto design which was not "accepted" by the vote. > I don't, since I know there are issues with the current design > regarding sub-navigation that I don't want to deal with (and apparently no > one else does either) given that those issues go away with Omar's design. OK, where are these issues documented? We have an issue tracker @ gborg: http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/pgweb/task/tasklist.php and we have a todo page on dev. version of site: http://wwwmaster.postgresql.org/todo >>Another question is: should I move to Australia before I'll be able to >>continue participating in new website development? > > I'm not sure I understand the above, but FWIW I've always wanted to move to > Australia if people are putting relocation packages together ;-) I meant that some effort was put into making the website development more open to the public. But right now we are having a closed development process again, only that was closed by a different group of people. Where is the discussion going? What is the current todo list?