X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D932B3A5FFC for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 20:38:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 75312-03 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 20:38:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tetra.ehpg.net (tetra.ehpg.net [216.218.206.34]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A26533A5FEA for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 20:38:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ppp-68-122-211-163.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net ([68.122.211.163] helo=[172.16.1.36]) by tetra.ehpg.net with asmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CbPcO-0000Lw-LD; Mon, 06 Dec 2004 12:38:00 -0800 Message-ID: <41B4C332.8030300@ehpg.net> Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 12:38:10 -0800 From: "Gavin M. Roy" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Page Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: New site - minor problem References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200412/114 X-Sequence-Number: 6233 This is my own code from a start company I am working on - http://www.palefacemodules.com/ - pardon the very sparse website... ;) I would be donating the license, and providing free database updates, as needed. Gavin Dave Page wrote: > > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Gavin M. Roy [mailto:gmr@ehpg.net] >>Sent: 06 December 2004 19:52 >>To: Dave Page >>Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org >>Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] New site - minor problem >> >>I'll address hosting in another email. My primary offer, >>knowing the politics of PgSQL related site hosting, is a >>closed-source prorpietary module that should very easily >>handle the ip to country needs of the launch. It provides >>the country as an environment variable, and has very, very >>little overhead. It is production stable and currently >>handles 20 million plus hits per day for some of my customers. >> >> > >Personally I'm not fanatically against closed source code - I'll use >whatever is best for the job at an appropriate price. Is this your own >code, and would you donate it wherever we ran the master site? > >Regards, Dave. > >