X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B92BC9DD702 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 23:38:16 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 43686-02-7 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 23:37:52 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from trolak.mydnsbox2.com (ns1.mydnsbox2.com [207.44.142.118]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D443B9DD7B0 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 22:03:58 -0400 (AST) Received: from dunslane.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by trolak.mydnsbox2.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id jB12LhM30536; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 20:21:43 -0600 Received: from 24.211.165.134 (SquirrelMail authenticated user andrew@dunslane.net) by www.dunslane.net with HTTP; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 20:21:43 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <4230.24.211.165.134.1133403703.squirrel@www.dunslane.net> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 20:21:43 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: Upcoming PG re-releases From: "Andrew Dunstan" To: In-Reply-To: <27165.1133368830@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <27165.1133368830@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Cc: , X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.5) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 required=5 tests=[none] X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200511/1563 X-Sequence-Number: 76845 Tom Lane said: > > We hashed all this out in the pghackers list back in August, but I > agree there ought to be something about it on the website. > The reason I asked again is that, notwithstanding the recent discussion, I have observed confusion about the matter (including Jan telling me he didn't think there was any agreed policy). cheers andrew