X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4A339DCB7B for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 12:13:56 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28228-03 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 12:13:53 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from trolak.mydnsbox2.com (ns1.mydnsbox2.com [207.44.142.118]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 479C79DCAD3 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 12:13:52 -0400 (AST) Received: from [192.168.1.103] (cpe-024-211-165-134.nc.res.rr.com [24.211.165.134]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by trolak.mydnsbox2.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id jAUGVjM00343; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 10:31:45 -0600 Message-ID: <438DCFB7.3040000@dunslane.net> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 11:13:43 -0500 From: Andrew Dunstan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050922 Fedora/1.7.12-1.3.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Lane CC: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Upcoming PG re-releases References: <26656.1133366185@sss.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <26656.1133366185@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.01 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.010] X-Spam-Score: 0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200511/1536 X-Sequence-Number: 76818 Tom Lane wrote: > We will >at the same time be making new dot-releases in the 7.3, 7.4, and 8.0 >branches, principally to fix the SLRU race condition reported by Jim >Nasby and Robert Creager. > > > > Was there a conclusion out of the recent discussion on EOL policy? The consensus seemed to be something like: "We will maintain releases to the best of our ability for at least 2 years plus 1 release cycle. After that, support may be dropped at any time when maintenance becomes difficult." Have we actually officially stopped supporting the 7.2 series? All this needs some announcement from the core trsam, IMNSHO - there has been some confusion over it (e.g. I saw someone recently saying we had stopped supporting the 7.3 series, which the above would seem to indicate is not true). cheers andrew