X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9639E9DCAC2; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 00:22:47 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 63577-06; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 00:22:43 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from hosting.commandprompt.com (128.commandprompt.com [207.173.200.128]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687949DD5EC; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 00:22:42 -0400 (AST) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (or-67-76-146-141.sta.sprint-hsd.net [67.76.146.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by hosting.commandprompt.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jB14GbH4007365; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 20:16:38 -0800 Message-ID: <438E7A9C.3010201@commandprompt.com> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 20:22:52 -0800 From: "Joshua D. Drake" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051013) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Marc G. Fournier" CC: David Fetter , Robert Treat , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, pgsql-www@postgresql.org, Tom Lane , Andrew Dunstan Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases References: <26656.1133366185@sss.pgh.pa.us> <438DCFB7.3040000@dunslane.net> <27165.1133368830@sss.pgh.pa.us> <200511301323.38351.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> <20051201013652.GB24009@fetter.org> <20051130235539.T1077@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20051130235539.T1077@ganymede.hub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (hosting.commandprompt.com [192.168.1.101]); Wed, 30 Nov 2005 20:16:38 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 required=5 tests=[none] X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200512/2 X-Sequence-Number: 8943 >> >> I see this as an excellent reason to draw a bright, sharp line between >> what vendors support and what the community as a whole does, >> especially where individual community members wear another hat. > > > So, if Sun, SRA, Pervasive, Command Prompt, etc were to submit a patch > for v7.2, we'd refuse it? I think not ... Oh but you should. The community has enough to worry about. Joshua D. Drake -- The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564 PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl - http://www.commandprompt.com/