X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC1709DCA2B; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 17:04:24 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 55438-06; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 17:04:25 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from service-web.de (p15093784.pureserver.info [217.160.106.224]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DC039DCA1E; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 17:04:22 -0400 (AST) Received: from [192.168.178.99] (p548B22D2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.139.34.210]) by service-web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31B2520002A; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 22:04:22 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43CAB8D4.4060700@wildenhain.de> Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 22:04:20 +0100 From: Tino Wildenhain User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Joshua D. Drake" Cc: John Hansen , Dave Page , Guido Barosio , "Marc G. Fournier" , Josh Berkus , pgsql-www@postgresql.org, "Jim C. Nasby" Subject: Re: Infrastructure monitoring References: <34F8F335525CB14C95CF92BE2194858E01285E@pdc.geeknet.com.au> <43CAB4D4.5060803@commandprompt.com> In-Reply-To: <43CAB4D4.5060803@commandprompt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.116 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.116] X-Spam-Score: 0.116 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200601/117 X-Sequence-Number: 9305 Joshua D. Drake schrieb: > Hello, > ... > Why do we "need" a separate server for the cgi's? Are they that hard on > the webserver? Maybe not using cgi would help? You can run webapp and postgres on the same server but putting them on separate servers really helps with having performance high. But it really depends on the application.