X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E00EB9DC814; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:35:17 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31805-04; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:35:16 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from hosting.commandprompt.com (128.commandprompt.com [207.173.200.128]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CF499DC83B; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:35:12 -0400 (AST) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (or-67-76-146-141.sta.sprint-hsd.net [67.76.146.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by hosting.commandprompt.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0GKPvQm016972; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 12:25:58 -0800 Message-ID: <43CC03DB.1000601@commandprompt.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 12:36:43 -0800 From: "Joshua D. Drake" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Marc G. Fournier" CC: David Fetter , gforge-admins@pgfoundry.org, pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: PgFoundry Move References: <43CBE53E.5090106@commandprompt.com> <20060116145602.C28752@ganymede.hub.org> <20060116202147.GC14577@fetter.org> <20060116162903.R28752@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20060116162903.R28752@ganymede.hub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (hosting.commandprompt.com [192.168.1.101]); Mon, 16 Jan 2006 12:25:59 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.065 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.065] X-Spam-Score: 0.065 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200601/146 X-Sequence-Number: 9334 > > If its a matter of time on Sean's part, can we ship the server up to > Joshua to put onto their network? > > My one criteria in all of this, from day one, was that it had to be > FreeBSD based, it has to be redundant with our current *core* > infrastructure ... as JoshB has stated in the past, he's sunk personal > money into the server *for* pgFoundry, so just 'ditching' that server, > IMHO, seems to be a no-op ... Well that machine is also doing other things that are sponsored, such as Bizgres so I am not sure that would be an issue. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > ---- > Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services > (http://www.hub.org) > Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: > 7615664 -- The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564 PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl - http://www.commandprompt.com/