X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B38AA9DC838 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:24:45 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 58312-02 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:24:45 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from hosting.commandprompt.com (128.commandprompt.com [207.173.200.128]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98AB39DC86C for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:24:41 -0400 (AST) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (or-67-76-146-141.sta.sprint-hsd.net [67.76.146.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by hosting.commandprompt.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0GMEtaK023703; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:14:58 -0800 Message-ID: <43CC1D67.3050402@commandprompt.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:25:43 -0800 From: "Joshua D. Drake" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Gavin M. Roy" CC: Darcy Buskermolen , gforge-admins@pgfoundry.org, pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [Gforge-admins] PgFoundry Move References: <43CBE53E.5090106@commandprompt.com> <200601161351.49681.darcy@wavefire.com> <7CFC6ED1-536D-4A5C-B148-F643E8E3F52D@ehpg.net> In-Reply-To: <7CFC6ED1-536D-4A5C-B148-F643E8E3F52D@ehpg.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (hosting.commandprompt.com [192.168.1.101]); Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:14:59 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.066 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.066] X-Spam-Score: 0.066 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200601/156 X-Sequence-Number: 9344 Gavin M. Roy wrote: >> My concerns with a plan like this are: >> A) I do not know linux as well as FreeBSD. > > 80% of the Gforge admins are Linux guys afaik, which is why we need > more FreeBSD help. Correct but the pool of Linux helpers is getting larger by the day. FreeBSD isn't, at least not at nearly the same rate. > > >> B) Can infrastructure be provided to allow for timely disaster >> recovery in the >> event of JD's hosting falling off the face of the earth, (much the >> same way >> the pg servers in panama fell off a while ago). > > We don't have this *really* in the case of most of the infrastructure, We do have this with CMD though. > and this isn't in place for pgFoundry right now with Marc hosting, > afaik. It is an issue we should be concerned with regardless of who's > hosting. That and backup. I've tried to address what's happening (or > not happening as I'm afraid) with backup before. We would back up this machine a minimum of once a day and could do it more if we liked. We can also replicate the database. >> C) How do we settle on the distro/version of the month, this >> fundamental issue >> within Linux has always left me with a bad taste in my mouth. (this is a >> personal item and has nothing to say for the quality of FreeBSD or >> Linux/distro). > Unlike *BSD? Generally there have been distros like Debian and > Slackware that have been server grade for over 10 years and are > solid. I think the distro of the month is a unwarranted slam from > FreeBSD people who don't see that others see BSD the same way (Free, > Net, Open, etc) just with less choice for their respective > communities. There are lots of Linux distros. Some are better at the > desktop, some are better at the server. Coming up with a consensus of > what to use would be pretty easy to do. That being said, I don't > foresee a day that we'd use Linux just because everything else is > running on FreeBSD. Being consistent is a good thing. Well the distro of the month argument is a farse. We would use a well known linux distro and we would stick with it. We are primarily a Redhat/FC house and Ubuntu house. > >> D) How does doing something like this affect -core in general (I'm >> not part of >> core so i have no idea) >> > > I don't think it general does. PgFoundry is isolated away from -core. That is correct it doesn't effect core at all. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > Regards, > > Gavin > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster -- The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564 PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl - http://www.commandprompt.com/