X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6757F9DC88B for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:31:34 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 60599-01 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:31:34 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from hosting.commandprompt.com (128.commandprompt.com [207.173.200.128]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22FFE9DC87E for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:31:29 -0400 (AST) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (or-67-76-146-141.sta.sprint-hsd.net [67.76.146.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by hosting.commandprompt.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0GMLjFv024023; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:21:46 -0800 Message-ID: <43CC1F01.6010200@commandprompt.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:32:33 -0800 From: "Joshua D. Drake" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Magnus Hagander CC: "Gavin M. Roy" , Darcy Buskermolen , gforge-admins@pgfoundry.org, pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [Gforge-admins] PgFoundry Move References: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE92E9D4@algol.sollentuna.se> In-Reply-To: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE92E9D4@algol.sollentuna.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (hosting.commandprompt.com [192.168.1.101]); Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:21:47 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.065 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.065] X-Spam-Score: 0.065 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200601/158 X-Sequence-Number: 9346 Magnus Hagander wrote: >>> My concerns with a plan like this are: >>> A) I do not know linux as well as FreeBSD. >> 80% of the Gforge admins are Linux guys afaik, which is why >> we need more FreeBSD help. > > You're probably going to see that split for anything where you compare > linux with freebsd today, aren't you? Or at least on average. Well yes which is my point. I am not knocking FreeBSD (well it's software RAID setup is a PITA but other then that). I am looking at this from a purely... let's talk about resources issue and our resources are in Linux except for a small handful of people. FYI, I can and do use FreeBSD. I prefer Linux. > > Yes, backup is definitly more important than failover. But failover is > nice :-) > But in reality, do we have it? As in failover that works in practice as > well. Just look at what happened when there was an attempt to move svr2 > (wwwmaster) off unionfs to a new VM *on the same machine*. > It's very good in principle. I'm sure in a lot of cases it works in > practice as well. I'm concerned it doesn't always, and that we are very > relying on certain people to make it work in that case. If the system is correctly documented and occasionally tested we should be able to do this. > preferences, and decide on one. Then stick with it as much as you can > :-) There is absolutely no need to do a general poll of the whol > community, since that's definitly going to give you more than you want > :-) HAHA... I can see it now: Vote for which Linux Pgfoundry will run on... The really bad thing about this is Gentoo would probably win ;) > > Everything else does not run FreeBSD. All www.postgresql.org servers > except borg (there are 5 in total, IIRC) run Linux today. AFAIK, > archives and search also run on linux. (And on a mix of distros, which > is probably not ideal) Yes Archives and buildfarm both run on Linux. I don't know about the others. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > > //Magnus -- The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564 PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl - http://www.commandprompt.com/