X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 488389DC838 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:43:43 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 63248-01 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:43:43 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from hosting.commandprompt.com (128.commandprompt.com [207.173.200.128]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C9D9DC86C for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:43:38 -0400 (AST) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (or-67-76-146-141.sta.sprint-hsd.net [67.76.146.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by hosting.commandprompt.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0GMXt3e024529; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:33:56 -0800 Message-ID: <43CC21DB.60903@commandprompt.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:44:43 -0800 From: "Joshua D. Drake" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Gavin M. Roy" CC: Magnus Hagander , Darcy Buskermolen , gforge-admins@pgfoundry.org, pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [Gforge-admins] PgFoundry Move References: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE92E9D4@algol.sollentuna.se> <43CC1F01.6010200@commandprompt.com> <92D165FF-97E8-4CE9-AC8C-0B43183390E8@ehpg.net> In-Reply-To: <92D165FF-97E8-4CE9-AC8C-0B43183390E8@ehpg.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (hosting.commandprompt.com [192.168.1.101]); Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:33:56 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.066 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.066] X-Spam-Score: 0.066 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200601/164 X-Sequence-Number: 9352 > >> If the system is correctly documented and occasionally tested >> we should be able to do this. > > What I'd like to see is a master svn repository for gforge code that > we use. that plus database backups would make for easy restore or > failover if we have issues. To not use source control on our changes > to the gforge code seems a bit silly. Of course this should be > isolated on a different machine than the gforge machine. Well I am 100% for that! I can set up a trac and everything! > Hey now, don't knock Gentoo. I was a slackware user since 1994 and > switched to Gentoo a few years back. I love it. It's not like it's > lfs and portage is pretty damn powerful. ;-) Don't let those > funroll-loops guys fool you, it can be serious on the server side too. I have you beat... I started with SLS (what Slackware was based off of) and in general I don't have a problem with Gentoo but I would not use it in a production server environment. I love using it for development. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > Gavin M. Roy > 800 Pound Gorilla > gmr@ehpg.net > -- The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564 PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl - http://www.commandprompt.com/